Independent review Prepared 2026-05-15 · Updated for Peter Shin's LDD-FINISH-01 (flooring)

Barnado Compound — Design Documentation

A refactored set of Locked Design Documents (LDDs), independent air-gap assessment, and budget analysis for a custom 120' × 60' compound build. PEMB shell, four 30' bays, integrated gym + living + ILS + workshop. Budget envelope $1.75M strict, site preparation excluded.

Overall
6.8/ 10

Above average for custom-build LDD discipline. Structural strategy is clean, plumbing and radiant are genuinely well-organized, constraint-discipline framework is the best meta-rule in any residential LDD set I've reviewed.

Above the $1.75M envelope. ROM rollup lands at ~$2.0–2.45M before site prep. The biggest pre-construction decision is which $300–400K of scope to trim or defer.

Headline assessment

Top three strengths

  1. Structural clarity. PEMB + four 30' bays + spine beam + no center column. The discipline to refuse a center column despite the 60' clear span is the project's signature move.
  2. Three-cluster plumbing. LDD-10 is the doc set's gold standard — the non-negotiable rules section reads like a senior engineer's checklist.
  3. Comfort-vs-maintenance radiant tiering. Two-tier (three-tier including the gym) strategy is the right answer and saves real lifetime energy.

Top three risks

  1. Budget overrun. ROM total ~$2.13M (now ~$2.43M with Peter's flooring LDD). See budget analysis.
  2. Island ventilation performance. Non-standard system for Korean BBQ-grade smoke at 8'–9' AFF. LDD-07 — build a mockup.
  3. Spine wall flush threshold + 85°F radiant cap. Two new constraints from Peter's LDD-24 that interlock with slab pour and radiant control. Time-critical.

Status board

24 LDDs, color-coded by readiness. Green = ready as written, Yellow = needs engineer or owner decision, Red = high risk, re-evaluate before locking.

LDD status board showing traffic light status for each of the 24 documents
Per-LDD status — click any item in the sidebar for the full document.

Scorecard breakdown

Structural soundness8.5 / 1012%
System integration8.0 / 1015%
Budget alignment4.5 / 1020%
Constructability6.5 / 1015%
Operational maintainability8.5 / 1012%
Documentation completeness7.0 / 108%
Risk concentration5.5 / 1010%
Aging-in-place / life-fit7.0 / 108%

Full reasoning and per-category notes in the air-gap review.

Building at a glance

Program zoning: ILS north, gym + living core, south bay workshop and garage
Program zoning. ILS is the north 30' bay. Central 60' core contains gym (west) and living wing (east), separated by the 60' spine wall. South 30' bay holds workshop, lift, and garage.

Where to start

If you have 15 minutes

Read the air-gap review top-to-bottom, then skim the top 5 risks.

If you have an hour

Read the assessment, then go through each red and yellow LDD: 07, 02, 11, 13, 20, 24.

If you're heading into the civil engineer meeting

Bring the questions list + the zoning diagram. Confirm site prep cost range.

If you're presenting to Peter

Open with the budget analysis and the three-path decision (grow / cut / phase).