LOCKED v1.0 Two-zone strategy locked; pre-construction items below Β· Source: Peter Shin, 2026-05-15

LDD-26 Β· South Gym Rebound + Acoustic Wall

Status: 🟒 LOCKED v1.0 β€” Peter's spec is internally consistent and disciplined. Air-gap items below are pre-construction reconciliation, not v1.0 blockers.

One-line intent

Calm athletic infrastructure: a two-zone south wall that takes ball impacts down low and absorbs reverb up high, all in the gym's restrained industrial language.

Why this matters

The gym needs a south face that earns its keep three ways at once β€” takes a beating, kills the upper-volume echo, and stays visually calm. Get this wrong and the gym either feels like a school gym (institutional, harsh, echoing) or like a fragile architectural set piece that breaks under real use. Peter's two-zone strategy (rebound low / acoustic high) is the right framework: it does each job in the zone best suited to it, and the lighting language ties it back into the unified gym perimeter.

This is the paired sister wall to LDD-25 north gym ballet wall. Together they bracket the gym between the LDD-04 west gym hero wall (clerestory) and the LDD-03 spine wall (gym/living boundary).

Locked decisions

Two-zone organization (LOCKED)

Zone Height Purpose
Lower athletic rebound floor β†’ ~16' AFF Controlled impact + rebound + abuse tolerance
Upper acoustic moderation ~16' AFF β†’ ceiling Reverberation reduction + visual softening

Lower athletic rebound zone

Lower wall finish (LOCKED)

Lower abuse strategy

Panelization

Upper acoustic moderation zone

Transition datum at ~16' AFF (LOCKED)

Lighting integration (unified with broader gym perimeter)

Hidden future infrastructure

Maintenance + serviceability

Open items / requires engineer review

Cross-references

Cost drivers

This is the cheapest of the four gym walls β€” the spec is intentionally cost-effective.

Likely-case rollup: $16–30K for the complete wall.

For comparison: LDD-25 north ballet wall is $30–55K. The mirror wall does more (mirrors + barre + protective net + embedded sconces); the rebound wall is genuinely cost-effective infrastructure. The asymmetry is intentional.

Air-gap concerns

  1. The "inexpensive mineral wool" call is fine IF acoustic targets are specified. Mineral wool from 1" to 4" varies hugely in absorption. Without an NRC target and a specific frequency band (gym noise is often mid-band, 500 Hz–2 kHz), the cheapest panel might absorb 0.5 at the target frequency β€” not enough to actually moderate gym reverberation. Lock NRC β‰₯ 0.85 minimum for the upper zone and let that drive material thickness + density.
  2. Mineral wool needs a ball-tolerant facing. Bare or even fabric-wrapped mineral wool will be punctured by errant balls eventually, even at 16'+ AFF. Spec a perforated metal scrim, microperf board, or rigid fabric facing rated for impact. The "cheapest mineral wool" should NOT mean exposed wool.
  3. Plywood impact panels need real athletic impact validation. Commercial gym plywood panel kits exist (e.g., Connor Sports, Robbins) β€” but they're sized for sport floors, not walls. Pick a wall-rated impact panel system or detail a custom plywood-on-blocking assembly with the framing engineer. "Plywood-based" + "robust backing" is direction, not spec.
  4. PEMB girt impact loading is not standard. PEMB girts are typically sized for cladding wind loads (~25–35 psf design pressure). Athletic ball impact is a localized peak load (a hard volleyball can deliver ~50–100 lbf concentrated). Either spec a stiffer girt at the lower zone or add secondary blocking. Catch this in the PEMB order, not in the field.
  5. Touch-up paint + tough coating is often a contradiction. Industrial-grade gym wall coatings (epoxy, urethane) are hard and abrasion-resistant but they don't accept touch-ups cleanly β€” the patch flashes and looks worse than the dent. Either (a) pick a satin/matte acrylic that touches up well but accept that it'll wear faster, or (b) pick the hard coating and accept that maintenance means re-coating a panel section, not touching up.
  6. The 16' AFF datum needs a horizontal-alignment audit. Verify that the 16' transition lines up with the west gym hero wall's clerestory bottom, or with another major gym horizontal (window head, mezzanine edge from LDD-13). If it doesn't, the gym gets two competing horizontals and the disciplined calm intent slips.
  7. "Hidden future infrastructure" must be detailed NOW, not deferred. Concealed anchor points only exist if blocking + fastener-rated substrate is installed before drywall/panels go up. Decide today: minimum grid spacing (4' Γ— 4'? 2' Γ— 2'?), load rating (50 lbs? 500 lbs?), and substrate type. Otherwise this LDD's "future flexibility" promise is theoretical β€” and 5 years from now a homeowner trying to mount a pull-up rig will discover there's nothing to bolt to.
  8. Charcoal matte wall + ball visibility tradeoff. Soft charcoal hides scuffs and reduces glare β€” but it also reduces ball contrast for some sports (volleyball + futsal balls are often white/yellow; charcoal background is fine for those). Confirm with a paint chip + a ball in the actual lighting before locking the LRV (light-reflectance value). If LRV is too low (< 10), the wall reads as a void at night and ball tracking suffers.
  9. Asymmetry with LDD-25 north wall is the design intent β€” but it bears stating. North wall = mirror + calm + recessed glass surface, vibration-isolated. South wall = plywood + rebound + acoustic, attached to PEMB. These two walls have opposite philosophies (isolated/calm vs. attached/active). This is correct for their functions, but verify the gym reads as a coherent room, not two halves of different rooms. Test by standing in the center and looking at both walls in the same field of view.

Diagram

No SVG yet β€” this LDD locks v1.0 from spec, not from drawn elevation. Future Codex prompt should illustrate: (a) 35' wall elevation showing the two zones with the 16' AFF shadow-gap datum, panel rhythm aligned to PEMB bays, sconce locations; (b) section through the wall showing the lower plywood panel assembly, upper mineral wool zone with facing, and the unified three-layer lighting integration.

Status

🟒 Green β€” LOCKED v1.0. Spec is internally consistent and the two-zone strategy is sound. Air-gap items above are pre-construction reconciliation (acoustic NRC target, coating selection, future-anchor grid) β€” none change the v1.0 design intent. Highest-priority follow-ups before bidding: (1) lock NRC target for upper zone + select faced panel system, (2) confirm PEMB girt spec at lower zone, (3) document the hidden-anchor grid.